“Don’t let the world around you squeeze you into its own mould, but let God re-mould your minds from within...”
Romans 12:2

No one logged in. Log in

Hilary's Desk

A message to the gullible

Hilary Butler - Thursday, October 01, 2009

Vaccines protect. Vaccines are safe. Vaccines never cause harm. Vaccines save lives. Got that? You stupid people who think that vaccines are to blame for everything under the sun, need to get a life. When are you going to get it through your heads that the cervical cancer vaccine did NOT kill that UK girl??!   Vaccines can’t do that!   The autopsy was quite clear. This girl had a malignant tumour in the chest, which was a serious underlying condition. That’s what killed her. The Cervarix shot, given two hours before she died, had nothing to do with it - quite coincidental.... Got that?

Opening and adjourning the inquest at Coventry magistrates court, she said: "It appears that Natalie died from a tumour in her chest involving her heart and her lungs." The condition, it is understood, had become progressively disabling. The inquest heard that the tumour had "heavily infiltrated" her heart and extended into her left lung. The Home Office pathologist, Alexander Kolar, explained to the hearing that Natalie's condition was "so severe that death could have arisen at any point"

So shall we just move on please?  NO WE SHALL NOT! 

Why would a parent, who knows their child has been poorly for some time, allow her to have a vaccine? Why do doctors use every possible opportunity, even when children are known to be sick, to jab them with everything under the sun? 

"Stepfather Andrew Bullock said Natalie, who attended Blue Coat CofE School, in Coventry, had been 'poorly for some time'.

She had been to see her GP several times and investigations into a mystery illness had been under way, he said."

But lets think this through further...

Consider the 17 deaths from swine flu in this country, who have died, supposedly because of underlying conditions.

EVEN THOUGH it’s underlying conditions which are said to be the main problem, you can bet your next sunshiny day, that when the swine flu vaccine come out, we will all be told to have them.  You won't be told, "The vaccine is unnecessary because it’s ONLY the underlying health issues that are the problem." We will probably be told that everyone needs to have the vaccine, in order to protect all those with underlying conditions!!  

All these people ONLY died from Swine flu, because the swine flu virus produces a serious health condition AS A RESULT of an underlying condition.

Why is it then so far fetched to ask this question: “What might happen to people with underlying conditions, who are given either Gardasil or Cervarix, or any vaccine for that matter?”

After all, if swine flu can exploit underlying conditions, why can’t a vaccine do likewise?

How about we enrol a large group of children in a vaccine trial who are KNOWN to have tumours. Half can receive Cervarix and the other half nothing. Lets see what happens!   Would any ethics committee approve such a study? My guess is that they would say, "It's unethical to vaccinate children with cancer."

Besides which, what parent would allow their sick child to be vaccinated? If there was even the possibility that such a vaccine would shorten such a child’s life, no parent would want that.

And here’s the REAL rub. New vaccines undergoing the three phase trials for licensing, never ever allow babies, children, or adults with known underlying, or active health conditions to take part in safety or efficacy trials. Then after the vaccines are licensed, suddenly we hear that these vaccines are  especially important for exactly that fragile group, ...   yet where is the scientific evidence to back up those statements?
 
Nowhere.

Don’t you think it’s about time that vaccine trials actually reflect the real world in which those vaccines will be used?

What about the soaring numbers of people who have drug side effects?  Why are side effects after vaccines always dismissed as "coincidental"?  Is there not a huge disconnect here?

Why are all the parents we hear from regularly, who complain of ongoing problems after vaccines, treated as if they are insane?  Why are parents who consider their child vaccine damaged, accused of having Munchausens, and their children put on an "at-risk" register?  Just what is going on here?

And don’t you think it’s amazing that while over a million American kids land up in hospital with drug reactions and adverse side effects from drugs every year, everything that happens after vaccines, is always blamed on the parent, or the person, BUT..... never the vaccine?
 
Or, as in this classic dumbed down piece of Australian consumer propaganda for CSL's new Panvax swine flu vaccine ... side effects are caused by the needle, not the contents.

Bookmark and Share