Hilary's Desk

Seems I'm not the only person on internet who thinks the proponents of mandatory vaccine trials need their ethics shaken up, and the group that should be participating in these proposed mandatory trials are the people who push vaccines. See here .

What I'd like to concentrate on here, is the first comment. "Perfect, they should force ALL DOCTORS, and only doctors, to participate in vaccine clinical trial. Doctors, of course, are the only people on the planet who can really give "informed consent" because the rest of us do not have a medical degree. None of them should be poor or wrongly motivated! Perfect! "

The provaccine zealots in this country and elsewhere, don't consider parents to have enough brains to make an educated "correct" choice. They also don't consider that choice means the right to say "no" - except in their lip-service public statements.  Behind closed doors, anyone who has said "no", has made the wrong choice, according to them.  That's why we are told to "consult your doctor" (who will tell you what the right choice is).

Whoever wrote this comment has a point.

Perhaps only those who consider themselves able to make a scientifically informed choice - by their own definition - should be allowed to participate in "mandatory vaccine trials". But we, the public, know this isn't the way it works, or the way that doctors mean it. Doctors think we should just "trust them" because they say "we doctors know the truth" and we people should just do as we are told, because they know best.

The problem is, that's not true, as anyone with even a smidgen of knowledge about the historical litany of medical disasters will know. I've often wondered why many doctors can't see the blindingly obvious - that they have no right to force anyone to do anything, particularly with regard to vaccines. But as Dr Nancy Banks, an obstetrician and gynaecologist said recently on a youtube presentation on vaccines, "In medical school, we are not educated to think, we are trained to do a job."

What has this resulted in? A medical system administered by people as focused and as aware as.....

A riderless race horse wearing the world's largest blinkers. Read Full Blog

One of my favourite haunts is a website called www.clinicaltrials.gov This website is where you see past, present and proposed vaccine trials.

It's a must for anyone looking at vaccines, particularly if you are looking at whether or not trials are applicable to YOU or your family. It's not unusual to find that one of more of your family members might have been excluded from a vaccine trial because of a "health condition".  Yet, when the vaccine is licensed, it's considered "safe" for everyone, including all the people excluded from the trials in the first place.

Quite a few of the trials on the website, have been suspended because of "lack" of healthy participants.

That doesn't mean there aren't enough supposedly healthy people around, one assumes... -  if you believe the whingers. Supposedly, it's because people don't want to be part of vaccine safety trials. So what's the possible solution?

Why, that's obvious, particularly with terrorists just waiting to kill off everyone with something really serious, so a medical journal has the answer...... let's consider mandatory vaccine trails.

I have absolutely no problem with mandatory vaccine trials, in the following recipients:

Everyone in the medical profession including: FDA CDC, ACIP,

All doctors and nurses in hospitals.

Anyone in any capacity who attempts to bully a parent to stick needles, or who actually injects vaccines into any other person.

Everyone involved in the manufacturing, transporting, licensing, and advocating of mass vaccination, and that of course includes Bill Gates, his family and everyone working at Microsoft.

There are SO MANY PEOPLE in this industry which seeks to mandate what parents should do, that given these staggering numbers, there should never be any problems recruiting vaccine safety trial subjects, should there?

After all, with safety of vaccines "a given", all of these people should have no hesitation to stepping up to the plate, and walking the walk. Pardon the mixed metaphors....

There is also a large group amongst the provaccine zealots who are now seeking to overturn philosophical objections in the states of America which currently have such a provision. And if they could, they would remove the religious objections as well. Some really dyed-in-the-wool amongst them, would also eliminate medical exemptions, since there is no vaccine which cannot be administered in hospital so that if the patient keels over, ICU can bring them back to life, ... maybe. But they will leave those two legal exemptions alone for now, because they can't upset the Muslims, and getting the medical exemption nuked might be a push too far...

Mandatory vaccination trials should start "at home" - using all the people who avidly want everyone else to "Just Do It" without question, and without exemption, and without reference to the realities of the clinical trials which often exclude more than 30% of the general population.

Fair enough, don't you think? And just think. For once, we might get an accurate assessment of vaccine reactions. Read Full Blog